1988 Swan 38 vs 1988 Moody 36 — Comparison

1988 Swan 38 1988 Swan 38
VS
1988 Moody 36 1988 Moody 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1988 Swan 38 1988 Moody 36
General
Manufacturer Nautor Swan Moody
Year 1988–1993 1988–1993
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Finland UK
Designer German Frers Bill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA 11.55 m (37.9 ft) 10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL 9.14 m (30.0 ft) 9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam 3.55 m (11.6 ft) 3.51 m (11.5 ft)
Draft 2.10 m (6.9 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,484 kg (16,499 lbs) 6,800 kg (14,991 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 2,700 kg (5,952 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 63.2 m² (680 ft²) 54.0 m² (581 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 120 L (31.7 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity 200 L (52.8 gal) 200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Swan 38
16.78
1988 Moody 36
15.29
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Swan 38
42.42
1988 Moody 36
39.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Swan 38
0.73
1988 Moody 36
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Swan 38
21.86
1988 Moody 36
20.90

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Swan 38 and 1988 Moody 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Swan 38 is a 1980s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 1988 Moody 36 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The 1988 Swan 38 was penned by German Frers. The 1988 Moody 36 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1988 Swan 38 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the 1988 Moody 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.51m beam. The 1988 Swan 38 is 0.58m longer than the 1988 Moody 36. The 1988 Swan 38 displaces approximately 10% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Swan 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.78 and 63.2 m² of sail area. The 1988 Moody 36, with an SA/D of 15.29 and 54.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 Swan 38 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Swan 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1988 Moody 36 has a comfort ratio of 20.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 42.4% for the 1988 Swan 38 and 39.7% for the 1988 Moody 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Swan 38 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1988 Moody 36 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Swan 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 Swan 38 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 Moody 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS