1988 Swan 38 vs 2015 ClubSwan 36 — Comparison

1988 Swan 38 1988 Swan 38
VS
2015 ClubSwan 36 2015 ClubSwan 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1988 Swan 38 2015 ClubSwan 36
General
Manufacturer Nautor Swan Nautor Swan
Year 1988–1993 2015
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Finland Finland
Designer German Frers Juan Kouyoumdjian
Dimensions
LOA 11.55 m (37.9 ft) 11.00 m (36.1 ft)
LWL 9.14 m (30.0 ft) 9.90 m (32.5 ft)
Beam 3.55 m (11.6 ft) 3.30 m (10.8 ft)
Draft 2.10 m (6.9 ft) 2.30 m (7.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,484 kg (16,499 lbs) 4,800 kg (10,582 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 63.2 m² (680 ft²) 65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 120 L (31.7 gal) 40 L (10.6 gal)
Water Capacity 200 L (52.8 gal) 60 L (15.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 4
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Swan 38
16.78
2015 ClubSwan 36
23.21
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Swan 38
42.42
2015 ClubSwan 36
35.42
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Swan 38
0.73
2015 ClubSwan 36
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Swan 38
21.86
2015 ClubSwan 36
14.37

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Swan 38 and 2015 ClubSwan 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Swan 38 is a 1980s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 2015 ClubSwan 36 is a modern offering from Nautor Swan from Finland. The 1988 Swan 38 was penned by German Frers. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 was designed by Juan Kouyoumdjian.

In terms of size, the 1988 Swan 38 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the 2015 ClubSwan 36 at 11.00m (36.1ft) with a 3.30m beam. The 1988 Swan 38 is 0.55m longer than the 2015 ClubSwan 36. The 1988 Swan 38 displaces approximately 56% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Swan 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.78 and 63.2 m² of sail area. The 2015 ClubSwan 36, with an SA/D of 23.21 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Swan 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has a comfort ratio of 14.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 42.4% for the 1988 Swan 38 and 35.4% for the 2015 ClubSwan 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Swan 38 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 60L water and 40L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Swan 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 Swan 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS