Catalina 385 vs 2015 ClubSwan 36 — Comparison
Catalina 385
2015 ClubSwan 36
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Catalina 385 | 2015 ClubSwan 36 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Catalina | Nautor Swan |
| Year | 2006–2014 | 2015 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Finland |
| Designer | Gerry Douglas | Juan Kouyoumdjian |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 11.73 m (38.5 ft) | 11.00 m (36.1 ft) |
| LWL | 10.21 m (33.5 ft) | 9.90 m (32.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.76 m (12.3 ft) | 3.30 m (10.8 ft) |
| Draft | 2.06 m (6.8 ft) | 2.30 m (7.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs) | 4,800 kg (10,582 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) | 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 65.0 m² (700 ft²) | 65.0 m² (700 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 35 HP | 15 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 40 L (10.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 242 L (63.9 gal) | 60 L (15.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 4 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Catalina 385 and 2015 ClubSwan 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 385 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 2015 ClubSwan 36 is a modern offering from Nautor Swan from Finland. The Catalina 385 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 was designed by Juan Kouyoumdjian.
In terms of size, the Catalina 385 measures 11.73m (38.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 2015 ClubSwan 36 at 11.00m (36.1ft) with a 3.30m beam. The Catalina 385 is 0.73m longer than the 2015 ClubSwan 36. The Catalina 385 displaces approximately 70% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Catalina 385 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.29 and 65.0 m² of sail area. The 2015 ClubSwan 36, with an SA/D of 23.21 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Catalina 385 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has a comfort ratio of 14.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the Catalina 385 and 35.4% for the 2015 ClubSwan 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Catalina 385 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 242L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 60L water and 40L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Catalina 385 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Catalina 385 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.