2015 ClubSwan 36 vs 1992 Contest 42 — Comparison

2015 ClubSwan 36 2015 ClubSwan 36
VS
1992 Contest 42 1992 Contest 42

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2015 ClubSwan 36 1992 Contest 42
General
Manufacturer Nautor Swan Contest
Year 2015 1992–2002
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Finland Netherlands
Designer Juan Kouyoumdjian Dick Zaal
Dimensions
LOA 11.00 m (36.1 ft) 12.80 m (42.0 ft)
LWL 9.90 m (32.5 ft) 10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam 3.30 m (10.8 ft) 3.86 m (12.7 ft)
Draft 2.30 m (7.5 ft) 1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,800 kg (10,582 lbs) 10,400 kg (22,928 lbs)
Ballast 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) 4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 65.0 m² (700 ft²) 76.0 m² (818 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Steel
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 55 HP
Fuel Capacity 40 L (10.6 gal) 250 L (66.0 gal)
Water Capacity 60 L (15.9 gal) 400 L (105.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 4 7
Cabins 1 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2015 ClubSwan 36
23.21
1992 Contest 42
16.20
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2015 ClubSwan 36
35.42
1992 Contest 42
40.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2015 ClubSwan 36
0.78
1992 Contest 42
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2015 ClubSwan 36
14.37
1992 Contest 42
21.49

Detailed Comparison

The 2015 ClubSwan 36 and 1992 Contest 42 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 is a modern design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 1992 Contest 42 is a 1990s offering from Contest from Netherlands. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 was penned by Juan Kouyoumdjian. The 1992 Contest 42 was designed by Dick Zaal.

In terms of size, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 measures 11.00m (36.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.30m, compared to the 1992 Contest 42 at 12.80m (42.0ft) with a 3.86m beam. The 1992 Contest 42 is 1.80m longer than the 2015 ClubSwan 36. The 1992 Contest 42 displaces approximately 117% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 23.21 and 65.0 m² of sail area. The 1992 Contest 42, with an SA/D of 16.20 and 76.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 14.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1992 Contest 42 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 35.4% for the 2015 ClubSwan 36 and 40.4% for the 1992 Contest 42, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 60L of water capacity and 40L of fuel. The 1992 Contest 42 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 400L water and 250L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1992 Contest 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1992 Contest 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS