1988 Swan 38 vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison

1988 Swan 38 1988 Swan 38
VS
2013 Elan 350 2013 Elan 350

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1988 Swan 38 2013 Elan 350
General
Manufacturer Nautor Swan Elan
Year 1988–1993 2013–2018
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Finland Slovenia
Designer German Frers Rob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA 11.55 m (37.9 ft) 10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL 9.14 m (30.0 ft) 9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam 3.55 m (11.6 ft) 3.46 m (11.4 ft)
Draft 2.10 m (6.9 ft) 2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,484 kg (16,499 lbs) 6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 63.2 m² (680 ft²) 58.0 m² (624 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 120 L (31.7 gal) 80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity 200 L (52.8 gal) 170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Swan 38
16.78
2013 Elan 350
17.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Swan 38
42.42
2013 Elan 350
30.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Swan 38
0.73
2013 Elan 350
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Swan 38
21.86
2013 Elan 350
19.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Swan 38 and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Swan 38 is a 1980s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1988 Swan 38 was penned by German Frers. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1988 Swan 38 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The 1988 Swan 38 is 0.88m longer than the 2013 Elan 350. The 1988 Swan 38 displaces approximately 23% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Swan 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.78 and 63.2 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2013 Elan 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Swan 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 42.4% for the 1988 Swan 38 and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Swan 38 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Swan 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Elan 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS