1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 vs Catalina 270 — Comparison

1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
VS
Catalina 270 Catalina 270

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 Catalina 270
General
Manufacturer Hallberg-Rassy Catalina
Year 1989–2000 1992–2002
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Sweden USA
Designer German Frers Gerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA 10.85 m (35.6 ft) 8.31 m (27.3 ft)
LWL 9.14 m (30.0 ft) 7.24 m (23.8 ft)
Beam 3.47 m (11.4 ft) 2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft 1.80 m (5.9 ft) 1.47 m (4.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs) 2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)
Ballast 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) 907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 60.5 m² (651 ft²) 31.0 m² (334 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 12 HP
Fuel Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity 250 L (66.0 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 5
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
16.40
Catalina 270
18.01
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
40.62
Catalina 270
39.21
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
0.72
Catalina 270
0.83
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
22.82
Catalina 270
16.24

Detailed Comparison

The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 and Catalina 270 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 is a 1980s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the Catalina 270 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 was penned by German Frers. The Catalina 270 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 measures 10.85m (35.6ft) overall with a beam of 3.47m, compared to the Catalina 270 at 8.31m (27.3ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 is 2.54m longer than the Catalina 270. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 displaces approximately 214% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of sail area. The Catalina 270, with an SA/D of 18.01 and 31.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 270 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The Catalina 270 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.83. The ballast ratios are 40.6% for the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 and 39.2% for the Catalina 270, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The Catalina 270 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 270 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS