1994 J/105 vs Catalina 270 — Comparison

1994 J/105 1994 J/105
VS
Catalina 270 Catalina 270

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1994 J/105 Catalina 270
General
Manufacturer J/Boats Catalina
Year 1994–2008 1992–2002
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Rod Johnstone Gerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA 10.52 m (34.5 ft) 8.31 m (27.3 ft)
LWL 8.97 m (29.4 ft) 7.24 m (23.8 ft)
Beam 3.28 m (10.8 ft) 2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft 1.98 m (6.5 ft) 1.47 m (4.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) 2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)
Ballast 1,678 kg (3,699 lbs) 907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 57.6 m² (620 ft²) 31.0 m² (334 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 12 HP
Fuel Capacity 38 L (10.0 gal) 45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 5
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 J/105
23.80
Catalina 270
18.01
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 J/105
43.52
Catalina 270
39.21
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 J/105
0.84
Catalina 270
0.83
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 J/105
13.68
Catalina 270
16.24

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 J/105 and Catalina 270 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 J/105 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Catalina 270 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1994 J/105 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Catalina 270 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1994 J/105 measures 10.52m (34.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Catalina 270 at 8.31m (27.3ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1994 J/105 is 2.21m longer than the Catalina 270. The 1994 J/105 displaces approximately 67% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 J/105 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 23.80 and 57.6 m² of sail area. The Catalina 270, with an SA/D of 18.01 and 31.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1994 J/105 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 J/105 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 13.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.84). The Catalina 270 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.83. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1994 J/105 and 39.2% for the Catalina 270, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 J/105 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Catalina 270 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Catalina 270 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 J/105 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1994 J/105 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS