1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 vs Hunter 280 — Comparison
Hunter 280
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 | Hunter 280 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hallberg-Rassy | Hunter |
| Year | 1989–2000 | 1998–2003 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Sweden | USA |
| Designer | German Frers | Glenn Henderson |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.85 m (35.6 ft) | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.14 m (30.0 ft) | 7.47 m (24.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.47 m (11.4 ft) | 2.82 m (9.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs) | 2,585 kg (5,699 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) | 998 kg (2,200 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 60.5 m² (651 ft²) | 34.0 m² (366 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 35 HP | 15 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 150 L (39.6 gal) | 45 L (11.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 250 L (66.0 gal) | 76 L (20.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 5 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 and Hunter 280 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 is a 1980s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the Hunter 280 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 was penned by German Frers. The Hunter 280 was designed by Glenn Henderson.
In terms of size, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 measures 10.85m (35.6ft) overall with a beam of 3.47m, compared to the Hunter 280 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.82m beam. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 is 2.32m longer than the Hunter 280. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 displaces approximately 181% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 280, with an SA/D of 18.35 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 280 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The Hunter 280 has a comfort ratio of 16.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 40.6% for the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 and 38.6% for the Hunter 280, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The Hunter 280 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 280 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 · Hunter 280