1989 J/35 vs Hunter 27 — Comparison

1989 J/35
VS
Hunter 27Hunter 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1989 J/35Hunter 27
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsHunter
Year1989–19931992–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRod JohnstoneHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam3.43 m (11.3 ft)2.79 m (9.2 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area57.6 m² (620 ft²)33.0 m² (355 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP12 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1989 J/35
19.46
Hunter 27
18.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1989 J/35
43.48
Hunter 27
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1989 J/35
0.79
Hunter 27
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1989 J/35
16.84
Hunter 27
16.96

Detailed Comparison

The 1989 J/35 and Hunter 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1989 J/35 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Hunter 27 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1989 J/35 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Hunter 27 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1989 J/35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.43m, compared to the Hunter 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.79m beam. The 1989 J/35 is 2.44m longer than the Hunter 27. The 1989 J/35 displaces approximately 109% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1989 J/35 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 19.46 and 57.6 m² of sail area. The Hunter 27, with an SA/D of 18.23 and 33.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1989 J/35 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1989 J/35 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Hunter 27 has a comfort ratio of 17.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1989 J/35 and 36.4% for the Hunter 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1989 J/35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 27 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1989 J/35 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1989 J/35 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1989 J/35 · Hunter 27