1989 J/35 vs Catalina 387 — Comparison

1989 J/35
VS
Catalina 387Catalina 387

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1989 J/35Catalina 387
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsCatalina
Year1989–19931996–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRod JohnstoneGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.43 m (11.3 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.96 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area57.6 m² (620 ft²)63.0 m² (678 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1989 J/35
19.46
Catalina 387
16.73
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1989 J/35
43.48
Catalina 387
39.39
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1989 J/35
0.79
Catalina 387
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1989 J/35
16.84
Catalina 387
18.47

Detailed Comparison

The 1989 J/35 and Catalina 387 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1989 J/35 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Catalina 387 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1989 J/35 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Catalina 387 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1989 J/35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.43m, compared to the Catalina 387 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The Catalina 387 is 0.91m longer than the 1989 J/35. The Catalina 387 displaces approximately 43% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1989 J/35 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 19.46 and 57.6 m² of sail area. The Catalina 387, with an SA/D of 16.73 and 63.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1989 J/35 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1989 J/35 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Catalina 387 has a comfort ratio of 18.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1989 J/35 and 39.4% for the Catalina 387, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1989 J/35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Catalina 387 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Catalina 387 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1989 J/35 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 387 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1989 J/35 · Catalina 387