1989 J/35 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison

1989 J/35
VS
2000 Sabre 386

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1989 J/352000 Sabre 386
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsSabre
Year1989–19932000–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRod JohnstoneJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam3.43 m (11.3 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area57.6 m² (620 ft²)60.5 m² (651 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1989 J/35
19.46
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1989 J/35
43.48
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1989 J/35
0.79
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1989 J/35
16.84
2000 Sabre 386
19.37

Detailed Comparison

The 1989 J/35 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1989 J/35 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1989 J/35 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 1989 J/35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.43m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 2000 Sabre 386 is 0.91m longer than the 1989 J/35. The 2000 Sabre 386 displaces approximately 39% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1989 J/35 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 19.46 and 57.6 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1989 J/35 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1989 J/35 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1989 J/35 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1989 J/35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1989 J/35 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Sabre 386 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1989 J/35 · 2000 Sabre 386