1990 Catalina 34 vs 1984 Ericson 38 — Comparison

1990 Catalina 341990 Catalina 34
VS
1984 Ericson 381984 Ericson 38

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Catalina 341984 Ericson 38
General
ManufacturerCatalinaEricson
Year1990–20041984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerFrank ButlerBruce King / Ron Holland
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL9.02 m (29.6 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.45 m (11.3 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,670 kg (12,500 lbs)7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area49.8 m² (536 ft²)60.0 m² (646 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Catalina 34
15.91
1984 Ericson 38
15.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Catalina 34
40.00
1984 Ericson 38
42.42
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Catalina 34
0.78
1984 Ericson 38
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Catalina 34
18.86
1984 Ericson 38
20.06

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Catalina 34 and 1984 Ericson 38 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Catalina 34 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1984 Ericson 38 is a 1980s offering from Ericson from USA. The 1990 Catalina 34 was penned by Frank Butler. The 1984 Ericson 38 was designed by Bruce King / Ron Holland.

In terms of size, the 1990 Catalina 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.45m, compared to the 1984 Ericson 38 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1984 Ericson 38 is 1.22m longer than the 1990 Catalina 34. The 1984 Ericson 38 displaces approximately 32% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Catalina 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.91 and 49.8 m² of sail area. The 1984 Ericson 38, with an SA/D of 15.93 and 60.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1984 Ericson 38 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Catalina 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1984 Ericson 38 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1990 Catalina 34 and 42.4% for the 1984 Ericson 38, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Catalina 34 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 1984 Ericson 38 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Ericson 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 Ericson 38 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Catalina 34 · 1984 Ericson 38