1990 Catalina 34 vs Hanse 320 — Comparison

1990 Catalina 341990 Catalina 34
VS
Hanse 320Hanse 320

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Catalina 34Hanse 320
General
ManufacturerCatalinaHanse
Year1990–20042005–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerFrank Butlerjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)9.92 m (32.5 ft)
LWL9.02 m (29.6 ft)8.80 m (28.9 ft)
Beam3.45 m (11.3 ft)3.28 m (10.8 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,670 kg (12,500 lbs)4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area49.8 m² (536 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)90 L (23.8 gal)
Water Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Catalina 34
15.91
Hanse 320
16.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Catalina 34
40.00
Hanse 320
30.43
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Catalina 34
0.78
Hanse 320
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Catalina 34
18.86
Hanse 320
17.40

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Catalina 34 and Hanse 320 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Catalina 34 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hanse 320 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1990 Catalina 34 was penned by Frank Butler. The Hanse 320 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1990 Catalina 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.45m, compared to the Hanse 320 at 9.92m (32.5ft) with a 3.28m beam. The 1990 Catalina 34 is 0.44m longer than the Hanse 320. The 1990 Catalina 34 displaces approximately 23% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Catalina 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.91 and 49.8 m² of sail area. The Hanse 320, with an SA/D of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Catalina 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Hanse 320 has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1990 Catalina 34 and 30.4% for the Hanse 320, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Catalina 34 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The Hanse 320 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 90L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Catalina 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1990 Catalina 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Catalina 34 · Hanse 320