1990 Feeling 32 vs 1984 Ericson 38 — Comparison
1990 Feeling 32
1984 Ericson 38
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1990 Feeling 32 | 1984 Ericson 38 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Feeling | Ericson |
| Year | 1990–1998 | 1984–1990 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | France | USA |
| Designer | Philippe Harlé | Bruce King / Ron Holland |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.85 m (32.3 ft) | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.20 m (26.9 ft) | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.15 m (10.3 ft) | 3.66 m (12.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.50 m (4.9 ft) | 1.98 m (6.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,700 kg (10,362 lbs) | 7,484 kg (16,499 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 40.0 m² (431 ft²) | 60.0 m² (646 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 30 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L (15.9 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 120 L (31.7 gal) | 200 L (52.8 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1990 Feeling 32 and 1984 Ericson 38 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s design by Feeling from France, while the 1984 Ericson 38 is a 1980s offering from Ericson from USA. The 1990 Feeling 32 was penned by Philippe Harlé. The 1984 Ericson 38 was designed by Bruce King / Ron Holland.
In terms of size, the 1990 Feeling 32 measures 9.85m (32.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.15m, compared to the 1984 Ericson 38 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1984 Ericson 38 is 1.73m longer than the 1990 Feeling 32. The 1984 Ericson 38 displaces approximately 59% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1990 Feeling 32 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Ericson 38, with an SA/D of 15.93 and 60.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1984 Ericson 38 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1990 Feeling 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1984 Ericson 38 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32 and 42.4% for the 1984 Ericson 38, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1990 Feeling 32 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 1984 Ericson 38 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1990 Feeling 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1984 Ericson 38 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1984 Ericson 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1990 Feeling 32 · 1984 Ericson 38