1990 J/40 vs 1981 Nautor Swan 36 — Comparison

1990 J/40
VS
1981 Nautor Swan 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 J/401981 Nautor Swan 36
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsNautor Swan
Year1990–19951981–1989
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFinland
DesignerRod JohnstoneSparkman & Stephens
Dimensions
LOA12.30 m (40.4 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL10.21 m (33.5 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft2.08 m (6.8 ft)1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Ballast3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area72.5 m² (780 ft²)54.5 m² (587 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 J/40
18.87
1981 Nautor Swan 36
16.15
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 J/40
44.12
1981 Nautor Swan 36
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 J/40
0.74
1981 Nautor Swan 36
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 J/40
17.98
1981 Nautor Swan 36
22.73

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 J/40 and 1981 Nautor Swan 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 J/40 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is a 1980s offering from Nautor Swan from Finland. The 1990 J/40 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 was designed by Sparkman & Stephens.

In terms of size, the 1990 J/40 measures 12.30m (40.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1990 J/40 is 1.33m longer than the 1981 Nautor Swan 36. The 1990 J/40 displaces approximately 21% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 J/40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.87 and 72.5 m² of sail area. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36, with an SA/D of 16.15 and 54.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1990 J/40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 J/40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has a comfort ratio of 22.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 44.1% for the 1990 J/40 and 42.9% for the 1981 Nautor Swan 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 J/40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 J/40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 J/40 · 1981 Nautor Swan 36