1990 J/40 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

1990 J/40
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 J/401982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsWesterly
Year1990–19951982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerRod JohnstoneEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA12.30 m (40.4 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL10.21 m (33.5 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft2.08 m (6.8 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area72.5 m² (780 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 J/40
18.87
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 J/40
44.12
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 J/40
0.74
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 J/40
17.98
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 J/40 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 J/40 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1990 J/40 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1990 J/40 measures 12.30m (40.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1990 J/40 is 2.80m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The 1990 J/40 displaces approximately 70% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 J/40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.87 and 72.5 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1990 J/40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 J/40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 44.1% for the 1990 J/40 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 J/40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 J/40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 J/40 · 1982 Westerly Konsort