1990 J/40 vs Hunter 33 — Comparison

1990 J/40
VS
Hunter 33Hunter 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 J/40Hunter 33
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsHunter
Year1990–19951988–1994
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRod JohnstoneHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA12.30 m (40.4 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL10.21 m (33.5 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft2.08 m (6.8 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area72.5 m² (780 ft²)48.0 m² (517 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 J/40
18.87
Hunter 33
17.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 J/40
44.12
Hunter 33
38.09
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 J/40
0.74
Hunter 33
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 J/40
17.98
Hunter 33
18.10

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 J/40 and Hunter 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 J/40 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Hunter 33 is a 1980s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1990 J/40 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Hunter 33 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1990 J/40 measures 12.30m (40.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the Hunter 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1990 J/40 is 2.24m longer than the Hunter 33. The 1990 J/40 displaces approximately 62% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 J/40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.87 and 72.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 33, with an SA/D of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1990 J/40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 J/40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The Hunter 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 44.1% for the 1990 J/40 and 38.1% for the Hunter 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 J/40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Hunter 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 J/40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 J/40 · Hunter 33