1990 Morgan 38 vs Hunter 30 — Comparison

1990 Morgan 381990 Morgan 38
VS
Hunter 30Hunter 30

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Morgan 38Hunter 30
General
ManufacturerMorganHunter
Year1990–19961991–1996
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerTed BrewerHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)7.92 m (26.0 ft)
Beam3.56 m (11.7 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area61.8 m² (665 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Morgan 38
16.41
Hunter 30
16.94
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Morgan 38
42.42
Hunter 30
41.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Morgan 38
0.73
Hunter 30
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Morgan 38
20.82
Hunter 30
19.54

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Morgan 38 and Hunter 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Morgan 38 is a 1990s design by Morgan from USA, while the Hunter 30 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1990 Morgan 38 was penned by Ted Brewer. The Hunter 30 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1990 Morgan 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the Hunter 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1990 Morgan 38 is 2.44m longer than the Hunter 30. The 1990 Morgan 38 displaces approximately 94% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Morgan 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.41 and 61.8 m² of sail area. The Hunter 30, with an SA/D of 16.94 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 30 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Morgan 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The Hunter 30 has a comfort ratio of 19.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 42.4% for the 1990 Morgan 38 and 41.2% for the Hunter 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Morgan 38 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Hunter 30 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Morgan 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 30 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1990 Morgan 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Morgan 38 · Hunter 30