1990 Sabre 36 vs 1998 Feeling 44 — Comparison

1990 Sabre 361990 Sabre 36
VS
1998 Feeling 44

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Sabre 361998 Feeling 44
General
ManufacturerSabreFeeling
Year1990–19981998–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerRoger HewsonPhilippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)13.41 m (44.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)11.50 m (37.7 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)4.10 m (13.5 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)10,500 kg (23,149 lbs)
Ballast2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)4,000 kg (8,818 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.5 m² (565 ft²)82.0 m² (883 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)400 L (105.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths68
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Sabre 36
16.34
1998 Feeling 44
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Sabre 36
41.53
1998 Feeling 44
38.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Sabre 36
0.74
1998 Feeling 44
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Sabre 36
19.29
1998 Feeling 44
16.90

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Sabre 36 and 1998 Feeling 44 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Sabre 36 is a 1990s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1998 Feeling 44 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1990 Sabre 36 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 1998 Feeling 44 was designed by Philippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios.

In terms of size, the 1990 Sabre 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1998 Feeling 44 at 13.41m (44.0ft) with a 4.10m beam. The 1998 Feeling 44 is 2.44m longer than the 1990 Sabre 36. The 1998 Feeling 44 displaces approximately 78% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Sabre 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.34 and 52.5 m² of sail area. The 1998 Feeling 44, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 82.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1998 Feeling 44 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Sabre 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1998 Feeling 44 has a comfort ratio of 16.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1990 Sabre 36 and 38.1% for the 1998 Feeling 44, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Sabre 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1998 Feeling 44 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 400L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Sabre 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Feeling 44 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Feeling 44 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Sabre 36 · 1998 Feeling 44