1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 vs 1978 Cape Dory 270 — Comparison

1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
VS
1978 Cape Dory 270 1978 Cape Dory 270

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 1978 Cape Dory 270
General
Manufacturer Wauquiez Cape Dory
Year 1990–1998 1978–1985
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France USA
Designer Jean-Marie Finot Carl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA 9.75 m (32.0 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 6.40 m (21.0 ft)
Beam 3.15 m (10.3 ft) 2.59 m (8.5 ft)
Draft 1.65 m (5.4 ft) 1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,500 kg (9,921 lbs) 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Ballast 1,800 kg (3,968 lbs) 1,134 kg (2,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 42.0 m² (452 ft²) 28.0 m² (301 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 12 HP
Fuel Capacity 65 L (17.2 gal) 38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity 120 L (31.7 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 4
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
15.66
1978 Cape Dory 270
14.60
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
40.00
1978 Cape Dory 270
41.66
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
0.76
1978 Cape Dory 270
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
19.88
1978 Cape Dory 270
24.39

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 and 1978 Cape Dory 270 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is a 1990s design by Wauquiez from France, while the 1978 Cape Dory 270 is a 1970s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 was penned by Jean-Marie Finot. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.15m, compared to the 1978 Cape Dory 270 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.59m beam. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is 1.52m longer than the 1978 Cape Dory 270. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 displaces approximately 65% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.66 and 42.0 m² of sail area. The 1978 Cape Dory 270, with an SA/D of 14.60 and 28.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1978 Cape Dory 270 has a comfort ratio of 24.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 and 41.7% for the 1978 Cape Dory 270, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 65L of fuel. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Cape Dory 270 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS