1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
VS
1983 Irwin 32 1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 1983 Irwin 32
General
Manufacturer Wauquiez Irwin
Year 1990–1998 1983–1988
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France USA
Designer Jean-Marie Finot Ted Irwin
Dimensions
LOA 9.75 m (32.0 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam 3.15 m (10.3 ft) 3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft 1.65 m (5.4 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,500 kg (9,921 lbs) 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast 1,800 kg (3,968 lbs) 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 42.0 m² (452 ft²) 41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 65 L (17.2 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity 120 L (31.7 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
15.66
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
40.00
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
0.76
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
19.88
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is a 1990s design by Wauquiez from France, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 was penned by Jean-Marie Finot. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.15m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1983 Irwin 32 displaces approximately 11% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.66 and 42.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 65L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1983 Irwin 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS