1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 vs 1984 Cape Dory 33 — Comparison

1990 Wauquiez Centurion 321990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
VS
1984 Cape Dory 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Wauquiez Centurion 321984 Cape Dory 33
General
ManufacturerWauquiezCape Dory
Year1990–19981984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerJean-Marie FinotCarl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)7.92 m (26.0 ft)
Beam3.15 m (10.3 ft)3.12 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.45 m (4.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area42.0 m² (452 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP22 HP
Fuel Capacity65 L (17.2 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
15.66
1984 Cape Dory 33
15.31
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
40.00
1984 Cape Dory 33
43.63
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
0.76
1984 Cape Dory 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
19.88
1984 Cape Dory 33
22.98

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 and 1984 Cape Dory 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is a 1990s design by Wauquiez from France, while the 1984 Cape Dory 33 is a 1980s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 was penned by Jean-Marie Finot. The 1984 Cape Dory 33 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.15m, compared to the 1984 Cape Dory 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.12m beam. The 1984 Cape Dory 33 is 0.31m longer than the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32. The 1984 Cape Dory 33 displaces approximately 11% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.66 and 42.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Cape Dory 33, with an SA/D of 15.31 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1984 Cape Dory 33 has a comfort ratio of 23.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 and 43.6% for the 1984 Cape Dory 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 65L of fuel. The 1984 Cape Dory 33 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Cape Dory 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 · 1984 Cape Dory 33