1991 Hunter 33.5 vs Hanse 320 — Comparison

1991 Hunter 33.5
VS
Hanse 320Hanse 320

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1991 Hunter 33.5Hanse 320
General
ManufacturerHunterHanse
Year1991–19962005–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerGlenn Hendersonjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)9.92 m (32.5 ft)
LWL8.84 m (29.0 ft)8.80 m (28.9 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.28 m (10.8 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.7 m² (546 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeShoal draftFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)90 L (23.8 gal)
Water Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1991 Hunter 33.5
16.65
Hanse 320
16.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1991 Hunter 33.5
37.50
Hanse 320
30.43
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1991 Hunter 33.5
0.80
Hanse 320
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1991 Hunter 33.5
18.53
Hanse 320
17.40

Detailed Comparison

The 1991 Hunter 33.5 and Hanse 320 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1991 Hunter 33.5 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the Hanse 320 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1991 Hunter 33.5 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The Hanse 320 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1991 Hunter 33.5 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the Hanse 320 at 9.92m (32.5ft) with a 3.28m beam. The 1991 Hunter 33.5 is 0.14m longer than the Hanse 320. The 1991 Hunter 33.5 displaces approximately 18% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1991 Hunter 33.5 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.65 and 50.7 m² of sail area. The Hanse 320, with an SA/D of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1991 Hunter 33.5 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Hanse 320 has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the 1991 Hunter 33.5 and 30.4% for the Hanse 320, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1991 Hunter 33.5 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The Hanse 320 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 90L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1991 Hunter 33.5 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1991 Hunter 33.5 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1991 Hunter 33.5 · Hanse 320