Hanse 320 vs 1984 C&C 37+ — Comparison

Hanse 320 Hanse 320
VS
1984 C&C 37+ 1984 C&C 37+

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hanse 320 1984 C&C 37+
General
Manufacturer Hanse C&C Yachts
Year 2005–2010 1984–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany Canada
Designer judel/vrolijk & co Cuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA 9.92 m (32.5 ft) 11.28 m (37.0 ft)
LWL 8.80 m (28.9 ft) 9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam 3.28 m (10.8 ft) 3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft 1.70 m (5.6 ft) 1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs) 6,577 kg (14,500 lbs)
Ballast 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs) 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 46.0 m² (495 ft²) 57.0 m² (614 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 25 HP
Fuel Capacity 90 L (23.8 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 320
16.90
1984 C&C 37+
16.50
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 320
30.43
1984 C&C 37+
41.39
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 320
0.79
1984 C&C 37+
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 320
17.40
1984 C&C 37+
19.46

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 320 and 1984 C&C 37+ represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 320 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1984 C&C 37+ is a 1980s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The Hanse 320 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1984 C&C 37+ was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the Hanse 320 measures 9.92m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1984 C&C 37+ at 11.28m (37.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 1984 C&C 37+ is 1.36m longer than the Hanse 320. The 1984 C&C 37+ displaces approximately 43% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 320 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 C&C 37+, with an SA/D of 16.50 and 57.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1984 C&C 37+ has a comfort ratio of 19.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 30.4% for the Hanse 320 and 41.4% for the 1984 C&C 37+, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 90L of fuel. The 1984 C&C 37+ offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 C&C 37+ is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 C&C 37+ offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS