2008 Najad 395 vs Hanse 320 — Comparison

2008 Najad 395 2008 Najad 395
VS
Hanse 320 Hanse 320

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2008 Najad 395 Hanse 320
General
Manufacturer Najad Hanse
Year 2008–2015 2005–2010
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Sweden Germany
Designer Judel/Vrolijk judel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA 12.10 m (39.7 ft) 9.92 m (32.5 ft)
LWL 10.30 m (33.8 ft) 8.80 m (28.9 ft)
Beam 3.80 m (12.5 ft) 3.28 m (10.8 ft)
Draft 2.00 m (6.6 ft) 1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement 9,000 kg (19,842 lbs) 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)
Ballast 3,500 kg (7,716 lbs) 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 71.0 m² (764 ft²) 46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 55 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 200 L (52.8 gal) 90 L (23.8 gal)
Water Capacity 350 L (92.5 gal) 150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2008 Najad 395
16.67
Hanse 320
16.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2008 Najad 395
38.89
Hanse 320
30.43
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2008 Najad 395
0.73
Hanse 320
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2008 Najad 395
19.88
Hanse 320
17.40

Detailed Comparison

The 2008 Najad 395 and Hanse 320 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2008 Najad 395 is a 2000s design by Najad from Sweden, while the Hanse 320 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 2008 Najad 395 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The Hanse 320 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 2008 Najad 395 measures 12.10m (39.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.80m, compared to the Hanse 320 at 9.92m (32.5ft) with a 3.28m beam. The 2008 Najad 395 is 2.18m longer than the Hanse 320. The 2008 Najad 395 displaces approximately 96% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2008 Najad 395 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.67 and 71.0 m² of sail area. The Hanse 320, with an SA/D of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2008 Najad 395 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The Hanse 320 has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the 2008 Najad 395 and 30.4% for the Hanse 320, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2008 Najad 395 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 350L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The Hanse 320 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 90L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2008 Najad 395 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS