Hanse 320 vs 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 — Comparison
Hanse 320
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hanse 320 | 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Pacific Seacraft |
| Year | 2005–2010 | 1982–2005 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | USA |
| Designer | judel/vrolijk & co | William Crealock |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.92 m (32.5 ft) | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.80 m (28.9 ft) | 6.55 m (21.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.28 m (10.8 ft) | 2.64 m (8.7 ft) |
| Draft | 1.70 m (5.6 ft) | 1.14 m (3.7 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs) | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs) | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 46.0 m² (495 ft²) | 30.5 m² (328 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Full |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 15 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 90 L (23.8 gal) | 45 L (11.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 150 L (39.6 gal) | 76 L (20.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 4 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hanse 320 and 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 320 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The Hanse 320 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 was designed by William Crealock.
In terms of size, the Hanse 320 measures 9.92m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.64m beam. The Hanse 320 is 1.69m longer than the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27. The Hanse 320 displaces approximately 45% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hanse 320 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, with an SA/D of 14.35 and 30.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hanse 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has a comfort ratio of 26.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 30.4% for the Hanse 320 and 42.9% for the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hanse 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 90L of fuel. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hanse 320 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.