1992 J/32 vs 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 — Comparison
1992 J/32
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1992 J/32 | 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | J/Boats | Pacific Seacraft |
| Year | 1992–1997 | 1982–2005 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Rod Johnstone | William Crealock |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.91 m (32.5 ft) | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.38 m (27.5 ft) | 6.55 m (21.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.13 m (10.3 ft) | 2.64 m (8.7 ft) |
| Draft | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) | 1.14 m (3.7 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,678 kg (3,699 lbs) | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 48.4 m² (521 ft²) | 30.5 m² (328 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Full |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 15 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 45 L (11.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 76 L (20.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 4 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1992 J/32 and 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1992 J/32 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1992 J/32 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 was designed by William Crealock.
In terms of size, the 1992 J/32 measures 9.91m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.64m beam. The 1992 J/32 is 1.68m longer than the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27. The 1992 J/32 displaces approximately 21% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1992 J/32 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 20.00 and 48.4 m² of sail area. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, with an SA/D of 14.35 and 30.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1992 J/32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1992 J/32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has a comfort ratio of 26.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1992 J/32 and 42.9% for the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1992 J/32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1992 J/32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1992 J/32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.