Hanse 320 vs 1994 Najad 343 — Comparison

Hanse 320 Hanse 320
VS
1994 Najad 343 1994 Najad 343

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hanse 320 1994 Najad 343
General
Manufacturer Hanse Najad
Year 2005–2010 1994–2004
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany Sweden
Designer judel/vrolijk & co Judel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA 9.92 m (32.5 ft) 10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL 8.80 m (28.9 ft) 8.69 m (28.5 ft)
Beam 3.28 m (10.8 ft) 3.25 m (10.7 ft)
Draft 1.70 m (5.6 ft) 1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs) 5,400 kg (11,905 lbs)
Ballast 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs) 2,200 kg (4,850 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 46.0 m² (495 ft²) 47.5 m² (511 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 90 L (23.8 gal) 100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 320
16.90
1994 Najad 343
15.68
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 320
30.43
1994 Najad 343
40.74
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 320
0.79
1994 Najad 343
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 320
17.40
1994 Najad 343
20.44

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 320 and 1994 Najad 343 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 320 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1994 Najad 343 is a 1990s offering from Najad from Sweden. The Hanse 320 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1994 Najad 343 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the Hanse 320 measures 9.92m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1994 Najad 343 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.25m beam. The 1994 Najad 343 is 0.44m longer than the Hanse 320. The 1994 Najad 343 displaces approximately 17% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 320 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The 1994 Najad 343, with an SA/D of 15.68 and 47.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1994 Najad 343 has a comfort ratio of 20.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 30.4% for the Hanse 320 and 40.7% for the 1994 Najad 343, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 90L of fuel. The 1994 Najad 343 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1994 Najad 343 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS