1991 Westerly Seahawk vs 1983 Freedom 36 — Comparison

1991 Westerly Seahawk 1991 Westerly Seahawk
VS
1983 Freedom 36 1983 Freedom 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1991 Westerly Seahawk 1983 Freedom 36
General
Manufacturer Westerly Freedom
Year 1991–1997 1983–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country UK USA
Designer Ed Dubois Garry Hoyt
Dimensions
LOA 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL 8.53 m (28.0 ft) 9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam 3.35 m (11.0 ft) 3.51 m (11.5 ft)
Draft 1.80 m (5.9 ft) 1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 6,123 kg (13,499 lbs) 6,123 kg (13,499 lbs)
Ballast 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 48.0 m² (517 ft²) 49.0 m² (527 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 28 HP 25 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity 220 L (58.1 gal) 190 L (50.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 3 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
14.57
1983 Freedom 36
14.88
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
40.75
1983 Freedom 36
37.04
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
0.73
1983 Freedom 36
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
22.81
1983 Freedom 36
18.82

Detailed Comparison

The 1991 Westerly Seahawk and 1983 Freedom 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk is a 1990s design by Westerly from UK, while the 1983 Freedom 36 is a 1980s offering from Freedom from USA. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk was penned by Ed Dubois. The 1983 Freedom 36 was designed by Garry Hoyt.

In terms of size, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1983 Freedom 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.51m beam. The 1983 Freedom 36 is 0.61m longer than the 1991 Westerly Seahawk.

Looking at performance, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.57 and 48.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Freedom 36, with an SA/D of 14.88 and 49.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1983 Freedom 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1983 Freedom 36 has a comfort ratio of 18.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.8% for the 1991 Westerly Seahawk and 37.0% for the 1983 Freedom 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 220L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1983 Freedom 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 190L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1991 Westerly Seahawk is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1983 Freedom 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1991 Westerly Seahawk offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS