1991 Westerly Seahawk vs 2010 Elan 340 — Comparison

1991 Westerly Seahawk1991 Westerly Seahawk
VS
2010 Elan 3402010 Elan 340

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1991 Westerly Seahawk2010 Elan 340
General
ManufacturerWesterlyElan
Year1991–19972010–2014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKSlovenia
DesignerEd DuboisRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,123 kg (13,499 lbs)5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)1,750 kg (3,858 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.0 m² (517 ft²)55.0 m² (592 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity220 L (58.1 gal)160 L (42.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
14.57
2010 Elan 340
17.31
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
40.75
2010 Elan 340
30.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
0.73
2010 Elan 340
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
22.81
2010 Elan 340
19.73

Detailed Comparison

The 1991 Westerly Seahawk and 2010 Elan 340 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk is a 1990s design by Westerly from UK, while the 2010 Elan 340 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk was penned by Ed Dubois. The 2010 Elan 340 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2010 Elan 340 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk displaces approximately 6% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.57 and 48.0 m² of sail area. The 2010 Elan 340, with an SA/D of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 2010 Elan 340 has a comfort ratio of 19.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.8% for the 1991 Westerly Seahawk and 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 220L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2010 Elan 340 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1991 Westerly Seahawk is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1991 Westerly Seahawk offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1991 Westerly Seahawk · 2010 Elan 340