Catalina 270 vs 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 — Comparison

Catalina 270 Catalina 270
VS
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Catalina 270 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
General
Manufacturer Catalina Hallberg-Rassy
Year 1992–2002 1997–2007
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Sweden
Designer Gerry Douglas German Frers
Dimensions
LOA 8.31 m (27.3 ft) 10.35 m (34.0 ft)
LWL 7.24 m (23.8 ft) 8.85 m (29.0 ft)
Beam 2.74 m (9.0 ft) 3.34 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.47 m (4.8 ft) 1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement 2,313 kg (5,099 lbs) 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast 907 kg (2,000 lbs) 2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 31.0 m² (334 ft²) 53.0 m² (571 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 12 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 45 L (11.9 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal) 200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 270
18.01
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
16.68
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 270
39.21
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
41.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 270
0.83
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 270
16.24
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
20.67

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 270 and 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 270 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is a 1990s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The Catalina 270 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the Catalina 270 measures 8.31m (27.3ft) overall with a beam of 2.74m, compared to the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 at 10.35m (34.0ft) with a 3.34m beam. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is 2.04m longer than the Catalina 270. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 displaces approximately 151% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 270 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.01 and 31.0 m² of sail area. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34, with an SA/D of 16.68 and 53.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 270 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 270 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.83). The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 39.2% for the Catalina 270 and 41.4% for the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 270 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 270 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS