2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser vs Catalina 270 — Comparison

2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser
VS
Catalina 270 Catalina 270

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser Catalina 270
General
Manufacturer Bavaria Catalina
Year 2012–2016 1992–2002
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany USA
Designer Farr Yacht Design Gerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA 9.99 m (32.8 ft) 8.31 m (27.3 ft)
LWL 8.95 m (29.4 ft) 7.24 m (23.8 ft)
Beam 3.42 m (11.2 ft) 2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft 1.85 m (6.1 ft) 1.47 m (4.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,400 kg (11,905 lbs) 2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)
Ballast 1,600 kg (3,527 lbs) 907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 52.0 m² (560 ft²) 31.0 m² (334 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 21 HP 12 HP
Fuel Capacity 65 L (17.2 gal) 45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity 120 L (31.7 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 5
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser
17.17
Catalina 270
18.01
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser
29.63
Catalina 270
39.21
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser
0.78
Catalina 270
0.83
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser
18.80
Catalina 270
16.24

Detailed Comparison

The 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser and Catalina 270 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser is a modern design by Bavaria from Germany, while the Catalina 270 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser was penned by Farr Yacht Design. The Catalina 270 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser measures 9.99m (32.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.42m, compared to the Catalina 270 at 8.31m (27.3ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser is 1.68m longer than the Catalina 270. The 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser displaces approximately 133% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.17 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The Catalina 270, with an SA/D of 18.01 and 31.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 270 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Catalina 270 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.83. The ballast ratios are 29.6% for the 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser and 39.2% for the Catalina 270, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 65L of fuel. The Catalina 270 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 270 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2012 Bavaria 33 Cruiser offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS