1992 Contest 42 vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison

1992 Contest 42 1992 Contest 42
VS
2003 Sabre 402 2003 Sabre 402

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1992 Contest 42 2003 Sabre 402
General
Manufacturer Contest Sabre
Year 1992–2002 2003–2010
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Netherlands USA
Designer Dick Zaal Jim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA 12.80 m (42.0 ft) 12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam 3.86 m (12.7 ft) 3.72 m (12.2 ft)
Draft 1.95 m (6.4 ft) 1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 10,400 kg (22,928 lbs) 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast 4,200 kg (9,259 lbs) 3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 76.0 m² (818 ft²) 66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull Material Steel Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 55 HP 40 HP
Fuel Capacity 250 L (66.0 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity 400 L (105.7 gal) 227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 7
Cabins 3 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1992 Contest 42
16.20
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1992 Contest 42
40.38
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1992 Contest 42
0.71
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1992 Contest 42
21.49
2003 Sabre 402
18.32

Detailed Comparison

The 1992 Contest 42 and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1992 Contest 42 is a 1990s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1992 Contest 42 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 1992 Contest 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 1992 Contest 42 is 0.61m longer than the 2003 Sabre 402. The 1992 Contest 42 displaces approximately 27% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1992 Contest 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.20 and 76.0 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Sabre 402 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1992 Contest 42 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1992 Contest 42 and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1992 Contest 42 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 400L of water capacity and 250L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1992 Contest 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Sabre 402 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS