1992 Contest 42 vs 2010 Elan 340 — Comparison

1992 Contest 421992 Contest 42
VS
2010 Elan 3402010 Elan 340

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1992 Contest 422010 Elan 340
General
ManufacturerContestElan
Year1992–20022010–2014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsSlovenia
DesignerDick ZaalRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL10.36 m (34.0 ft)9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam3.86 m (12.7 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement10,400 kg (22,928 lbs)5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)1,750 kg (3,858 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area76.0 m² (818 ft²)55.0 m² (592 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity400 L (105.7 gal)160 L (42.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1992 Contest 42
16.20
2010 Elan 340
17.31
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1992 Contest 42
40.38
2010 Elan 340
30.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1992 Contest 42
0.71
2010 Elan 340
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1992 Contest 42
21.49
2010 Elan 340
19.73

Detailed Comparison

The 1992 Contest 42 and 2010 Elan 340 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1992 Contest 42 is a 1990s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 2010 Elan 340 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1992 Contest 42 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 2010 Elan 340 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1992 Contest 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the 2010 Elan 340 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1992 Contest 42 is 2.44m longer than the 2010 Elan 340. The 1992 Contest 42 displaces approximately 79% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1992 Contest 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.20 and 76.0 m² of sail area. The 2010 Elan 340, with an SA/D of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1992 Contest 42 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 2010 Elan 340 has a comfort ratio of 19.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1992 Contest 42 and 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1992 Contest 42 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 400L of water capacity and 250L of fuel. The 2010 Elan 340 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1992 Contest 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1992 Contest 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1992 Contest 42 · 2010 Elan 340