Hunter 27 vs 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 — Comparison

Hunter 27Hunter 27
VS
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 272010 X-Yachts Xc 35
General
ManufacturerHunterX-Yachts
Year1992–19982010–2016
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSADenmark
DesignerHunter Design TeamNiels Jeppesen
Dimensions
LOA8.23 m (27.0 ft)10.57 m (34.7 ft)
LWL7.32 m (24.0 ft)9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam2.79 m (9.2 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast907 kg (2,000 lbs)2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area33.0 m² (355 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine12 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)70 L (18.5 gal)
Water Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 27
18.23
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
16.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 27
36.35
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
36.21
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 27
0.82
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 27
16.96
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
19.28

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 27 and 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 27 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is a modern offering from X-Yachts from Denmark. The Hunter 27 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 was designed by Niels Jeppesen.

In terms of size, the Hunter 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.79m, compared to the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 at 10.57m (34.7ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is 2.34m longer than the Hunter 27. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 displaces approximately 132% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 27 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.23 and 33.0 m² of sail area. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35, with an SA/D of 16.37 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 27 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has a comfort ratio of 19.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 36.4% for the Hunter 27 and 36.2% for the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 27 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 70L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 27 · 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35