1992 J/32 vs 1992 Moody 41 — Comparison

1992 J/32
VS
1992 Moody 411992 Moody 41

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1992 J/321992 Moody 41
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsMoody
Year1992–19971992–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerRod JohnstoneBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA9.91 m (32.5 ft)12.50 m (41.0 ft)
LWL8.38 m (27.5 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam3.13 m (10.3 ft)3.86 m (12.7 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)9,800 kg (21,605 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)3,800 kg (8,378 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.4 m² (521 ft²)70.0 m² (754 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)360 L (95.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1992 J/32
20.00
1992 Moody 41
15.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1992 J/32
43.52
1992 Moody 41
38.78
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1992 J/32
0.80
1992 Moody 41
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1992 J/32
16.59
1992 Moody 41
20.58

Detailed Comparison

The 1992 J/32 and 1992 Moody 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1992 J/32 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1992 Moody 41 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 1992 J/32 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 1992 Moody 41 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1992 J/32 measures 9.91m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the 1992 Moody 41 at 12.50m (41.0ft) with a 3.86m beam. The 1992 Moody 41 is 2.59m longer than the 1992 J/32. The 1992 Moody 41 displaces approximately 154% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1992 J/32 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 20.00 and 48.4 m² of sail area. The 1992 Moody 41, with an SA/D of 15.53 and 70.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1992 J/32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1992 J/32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1992 Moody 41 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1992 J/32 and 38.8% for the 1992 Moody 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1992 J/32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1992 Moody 41 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 360L water and 180L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1992 Moody 41 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1992 J/32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1992 Moody 41 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1992 J/32 · 1992 Moody 41