1992 J/32 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1992 J/32 | 1995 Feeling 39 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | J/Boats | Feeling |
| Year | 1992–1997 | 1995–2003 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | France |
| Designer | Rod Johnstone | Philippe Harlé |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.91 m (32.5 ft) | 11.80 m (38.7 ft) |
| LWL | 8.38 m (27.5 ft) | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.13 m (10.3 ft) | 3.78 m (12.4 ft) |
| Draft | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) | 7,800 kg (17,196 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,678 kg (3,699 lbs) | 3,000 kg (6,614 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 48.4 m² (521 ft²) | 66.0 m² (710 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 120 L (31.7 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 250 L (66.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1992 J/32 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1992 J/32 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1992 J/32 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.
In terms of size, the 1992 J/32 measures 9.91m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The 1995 Feeling 39 is 1.89m longer than the 1992 J/32. The 1995 Feeling 39 displaces approximately 102% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1992 J/32 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 20.00 and 48.4 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1992 J/32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1992 J/32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1992 J/32 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1992 J/32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1995 Feeling 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1992 J/32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1995 Feeling 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1992 J/32 · 1995 Feeling 39