1992 J/32 vs Hunter 240 — Comparison
Hunter 240
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1992 J/32 | Hunter 240 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | J/Boats | Hunter |
| Year | 1992–1997 | 1999–2004 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Rod Johnstone | Glenn Henderson |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.91 m (32.5 ft) | 7.32 m (24.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.38 m (27.5 ft) | 6.17 m (20.2 ft) |
| Beam | 3.13 m (10.3 ft) | 2.44 m (8.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) | 1.22 m (4.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,678 kg (3,699 lbs) | 476 kg (1,049 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 48.4 m² (521 ft²) | 22.5 m² (242 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 8 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 19 L (5.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 30 L (7.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 4 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1992 J/32 and Hunter 240 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1992 J/32 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Hunter 240 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1992 J/32 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Hunter 240 was designed by Glenn Henderson.
In terms of size, the 1992 J/32 measures 9.91m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the Hunter 240 at 7.32m (24.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The 1992 J/32 is 2.59m longer than the Hunter 240. The 1992 J/32 displaces approximately 183% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1992 J/32 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 20.00 and 48.4 m² of sail area. The Hunter 240, with an SA/D of 18.62 and 22.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1992 J/32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1992 J/32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Hunter 240 has a comfort ratio of 15.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.88. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1992 J/32 and 35.0% for the Hunter 240, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1992 J/32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 240 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 30L water and 19L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1992 J/32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1992 J/32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1992 J/32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1992 J/32 · Hunter 240