1993 Moody 31 vs Hunter 33 — Comparison

1993 Moody 31 1993 Moody 31
VS
Hunter 33 Hunter 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1993 Moody 31 Hunter 33
General
Manufacturer Moody Hunter
Year 1993–2000 1988–1994
Type Sloop Sloop
Country UK USA
Designer Bill Dixon Hunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA 9.45 m (31.0 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 7.80 m (25.6 ft) 8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam 3.13 m (10.3 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,500 kg (9,921 lbs) 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast 1,800 kg (3,968 lbs) 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 40.5 m² (436 ft²) 48.0 m² (517 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Bilge Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1993 Moody 31
15.10
Hunter 33
17.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1993 Moody 31
40.00
Hunter 33
38.09
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1993 Moody 31
0.76
Hunter 33
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1993 Moody 31
21.98
Hunter 33
18.10

Detailed Comparison

The 1993 Moody 31 and Hunter 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1993 Moody 31 is a 1990s design by Moody from UK, while the Hunter 33 is a 1980s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1993 Moody 31 was penned by Bill Dixon. The Hunter 33 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1993 Moody 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the Hunter 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The Hunter 33 is 0.61m longer than the 1993 Moody 31. The Hunter 33 displaces approximately 6% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1993 Moody 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.10 and 40.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 33, with an SA/D of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1993 Moody 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hunter 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1993 Moody 31 and 38.1% for the Hunter 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1993 Moody 31 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hunter 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1993 Moody 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS