1993 Najad 360 vs 1972 Ranger 29 — Comparison

1993 Najad 3601993 Najad 360
VS
1972 Ranger 291972 Ranger 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1993 Najad 3601972 Ranger 29
General
ManufacturerNajadRanger
Year1993–20021972–1978
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerJudel/VrolijkGary Mull
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam3.42 m (11.2 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,500 kg (14,330 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast2,700 kg (5,952 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area55.0 m² (592 ft²)35.0 m² (377 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1993 Najad 360
16.04
1972 Ranger 29
16.47
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1993 Najad 360
41.54
1972 Ranger 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1993 Najad 360
0.73
1972 Ranger 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1993 Najad 360
20.68
1972 Ranger 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1993 Najad 360 and 1972 Ranger 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1993 Najad 360 is a 1990s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1972 Ranger 29 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1993 Najad 360 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1972 Ranger 29 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1993 Najad 360 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.42m, compared to the 1972 Ranger 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1993 Najad 360 is 2.13m longer than the 1972 Ranger 29. The 1993 Najad 360 displaces approximately 105% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1993 Najad 360 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.04 and 55.0 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ranger 29, with an SA/D of 16.47 and 35.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1972 Ranger 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1993 Najad 360 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1972 Ranger 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1993 Najad 360 and 42.9% for the 1972 Ranger 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1993 Najad 360 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1972 Ranger 29 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1993 Najad 360 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1972 Ranger 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1993 Najad 360 · 1972 Ranger 29