Catalina 250 vs 1976 Ericson 29 — Comparison
Catalina 250
1976 Ericson 29
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Catalina 250 | 1976 Ericson 29 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Catalina | Ericson |
| Year | 1994–2004 | 1976–1983 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Gerry Douglas | Bruce King |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) | 8.84 m (29.0 ft) |
| LWL | 6.78 m (22.2 ft) | 7.32 m (24.0 ft) |
| Beam | 2.59 m (8.5 ft) | 2.84 m (9.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 1,588 kg (3,501 lbs) | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 612 kg (1,349 lbs) | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 24.5 m² (264 ft²) | 34.0 m² (366 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 10 HP | 13 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 30 L (7.9 gal) | 45 L (11.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 42 L (11.1 gal) | 76 L (20.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 4 | 5 |
| Cabins | 1 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Catalina 250 and 1976 Ericson 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 250 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1976 Ericson 29 is a 1970s offering from Ericson from USA. The Catalina 250 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1976 Ericson 29 was designed by Bruce King.
In terms of size, the Catalina 250 measures 7.62m (25.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the 1976 Ericson 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1976 Ericson 29 is 1.22m longer than the Catalina 250. The 1976 Ericson 29 displaces approximately 100% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Catalina 250 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.30 and 24.5 m² of sail area. The 1976 Ericson 29, with an SA/D of 15.99 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 250 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Catalina 250 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 13.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.89). The 1976 Ericson 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the Catalina 250 and 42.9% for the 1976 Ericson 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Catalina 250 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 42L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 1976 Ericson 29 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1976 Ericson 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Catalina 250 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1976 Ericson 29 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Catalina 250 · 1976 Ericson 29