Catalina 250 vs 1984 Moody 33 — Comparison

Catalina 250Catalina 250
VS
1984 Moody 331984 Moody 33

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 2501984 Moody 33
General
ManufacturerCatalinaMoody
Year1994–20041984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerGerry DouglasBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA7.62 m (25.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL6.78 m (22.2 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam2.59 m (8.5 ft)3.25 m (10.7 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.40 m (4.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Ballast612 kg (1,349 lbs)2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area24.5 m² (264 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity30 L (7.9 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity42 L (11.1 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths46
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 250
18.30
1984 Moody 33
14.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 250
38.54
1984 Moody 33
40.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 250
0.89
1984 Moody 33
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 250
13.89
1984 Moody 33
21.57

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 250 and 1984 Moody 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 250 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1984 Moody 33 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The Catalina 250 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1984 Moody 33 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the Catalina 250 measures 7.62m (25.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the 1984 Moody 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.25m beam. The 1984 Moody 33 is 2.44m longer than the Catalina 250. The 1984 Moody 33 displaces approximately 227% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 250 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.30 and 24.5 m² of sail area. The 1984 Moody 33, with an SA/D of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Catalina 250 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 250 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 13.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.89). The 1984 Moody 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the Catalina 250 and 40.4% for the 1984 Moody 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 250 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 42L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 1984 Moody 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Moody 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 250 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 Moody 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 250 · 1984 Moody 33