Catalina 250 vs 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 — Comparison

Catalina 250 Catalina 250
VS
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Catalina 250 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
General
Manufacturer Catalina Pacific Seacraft
Year 1994–2004 1990–2007
Type Sloop Cutter
Country USA USA
Designer Gerry Douglas William Crealock
Dimensions
LOA 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL 6.78 m (22.2 ft) 8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam 2.59 m (8.5 ft) 3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft 1.37 m (4.5 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 1,588 kg (3,501 lbs) 6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Ballast 612 kg (1,349 lbs) 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 24.5 m² (264 ft²) 51.5 m² (554 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 10 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 30 L (7.9 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity 42 L (11.1 gal) 227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 4 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 250
18.30
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
15.26
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 250
38.54
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 250
0.89
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
0.69
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 250
13.89
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
26.98

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 250 and 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 represent different approaches to sailboat design. The Catalina 250 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is a 1990s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The Catalina 250 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the Catalina 250 measures 7.62m (25.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is 2.74m longer than the Catalina 250. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 displaces approximately 300% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 250 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.30 and 24.5 m² of sail area. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34, with an SA/D of 15.26 and 51.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 250 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 250 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 13.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.89). The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 has a comfort ratio of 27.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.69. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the Catalina 250 and 42.9% for the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 250 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 42L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 250 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS