1994 Catalina 320 vs Catalina 34 MkII — Comparison

1994 Catalina 3201994 Catalina 320
VS
Catalina 34 MkII

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 Catalina 320Catalina 34 MkII
General
ManufacturerCatalinaCatalina
Year1994–20071995–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast1,905 kg (4,200 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area47.4 m² (510 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity133 L (35.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Catalina 320
17.01
Catalina 34 MkII
17.08
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Catalina 320
40.00
Catalina 34 MkII
37.50
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Catalina 320
0.80
Catalina 34 MkII
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Catalina 320
18.48
Catalina 34 MkII
18.13

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Catalina 320 and Catalina 34 MkII represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Catalina 320 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the Catalina 34 MkII is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1994 Catalina 320 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Catalina 34 MkII was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1994 Catalina 320 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the Catalina 34 MkII at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The Catalina 34 MkII is 0.61m longer than the 1994 Catalina 320. The Catalina 34 MkII displaces approximately 14% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Catalina 320 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.01 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The Catalina 34 MkII, with an SA/D of 17.08 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 34 MkII has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Catalina 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Catalina 34 MkII has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1994 Catalina 320 and 37.5% for the Catalina 34 MkII, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Catalina 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 133L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Catalina 34 MkII offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1994 Catalina 320 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 34 MkII has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 Catalina 320 · Catalina 34 MkII