1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison

1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
VS
1995 Feeling 39

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 Hallberg-Rassy 291995 Feeling 39
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyFeeling
Year1994–20031995–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenFrance
DesignerOlle EnderleinPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA8.85 m (29.0 ft)11.80 m (38.7 ft)
LWL7.70 m (25.3 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.02 m (9.9 ft)3.78 m (12.4 ft)
Draft1.50 m (4.9 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,700 kg (8,157 lbs)7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)
Ballast1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area38.0 m² (409 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity60 L (15.9 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths57
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
16.14
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
40.54
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
0.78
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
20.16
1995 Feeling 39
18.21

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is a 1990s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 was penned by Olle Enderlein. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 measures 8.85m (29.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.02m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The 1995 Feeling 39 is 2.95m longer than the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29. The 1995 Feeling 39 displaces approximately 111% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.14 and 38.0 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1995 Feeling 39 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Feeling 39 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Feeling 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 · 1995 Feeling 39