1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison

1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
VS
2013 Elan 350 2013 Elan 350

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 2013 Elan 350
General
Manufacturer Hallberg-Rassy Elan
Year 1994–2003 2013–2018
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Sweden Slovenia
Designer Olle Enderlein Rob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA 8.85 m (29.0 ft) 10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL 7.70 m (25.3 ft) 9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam 3.02 m (9.9 ft) 3.46 m (11.4 ft)
Draft 1.50 m (4.9 ft) 2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,700 kg (8,157 lbs) 6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)
Ballast 1,500 kg (3,307 lbs) 1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 38.0 m² (409 ft²) 58.0 m² (624 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 60 L (15.9 gal) 80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity 100 L (26.4 gal) 170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
16.14
2013 Elan 350
17.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
40.54
2013 Elan 350
30.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
0.78
2013 Elan 350
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
20.16
2013 Elan 350
19.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is a 1990s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 was penned by Olle Enderlein. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 measures 8.85m (29.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.02m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The 2013 Elan 350 is 1.82m longer than the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29. The 2013 Elan 350 displaces approximately 65% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.14 and 38.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2013 Elan 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Elan 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2013 Elan 350 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS