1994 Hylas 42 vs Catalina 385 — Comparison

1994 Hylas 42 1994 Hylas 42
VS
Catalina 385 Catalina 385

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1994 Hylas 42 Catalina 385
General
Manufacturer Hylas Catalina
Year 1994–2004 2006–2014
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Taiwan USA
Designer German Frers Gerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA 12.80 m (42.0 ft) 11.73 m (38.5 ft)
LWL 10.52 m (34.5 ft) 10.21 m (33.5 ft)
Beam 3.86 m (12.7 ft) 3.76 m (12.3 ft)
Draft 1.83 m (6.0 ft) 2.06 m (6.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement 9,525 kg (20,999 lbs) 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 74.3 m² (800 ft²) 65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 55 HP 35 HP
Fuel Capacity 189 L (49.9 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity 379 L (100.1 gal) 242 L (63.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Hylas 42
16.80
Catalina 385
16.29
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Hylas 42
40.48
Catalina 385
38.89
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Hylas 42
0.73
Catalina 385
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Hylas 42
19.29
Catalina 385
18.89

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Hylas 42 and Catalina 385 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Hylas 42 is a 1990s design by Hylas from Taiwan, while the Catalina 385 is a 2000s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1994 Hylas 42 was penned by German Frers. The Catalina 385 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1994 Hylas 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the Catalina 385 at 11.73m (38.5ft) with a 3.76m beam. The 1994 Hylas 42 is 1.07m longer than the Catalina 385. The 1994 Hylas 42 displaces approximately 17% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Hylas 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.80 and 74.3 m² of sail area. The Catalina 385, with an SA/D of 16.29 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1994 Hylas 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Hylas 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The Catalina 385 has a comfort ratio of 18.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1994 Hylas 42 and 38.9% for the Catalina 385, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Hylas 42 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 379L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The Catalina 385 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 242L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1994 Hylas 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 Hylas 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS