1994 Hylas 42 vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison

1994 Hylas 42
VS
2013 Elan 350

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 Hylas 422013 Elan 350
General
ManufacturerHylasElan
Year1994–20042013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryTaiwanSlovenia
DesignerGerman FrersRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL10.52 m (34.5 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.86 m (12.7 ft)3.46 m (11.4 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)
Ballast3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area74.3 m² (800 ft²)58.0 m² (624 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity379 L (100.1 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Hylas 42
16.80
2013 Elan 350
17.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Hylas 42
40.48
2013 Elan 350
30.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Hylas 42
0.73
2013 Elan 350
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Hylas 42
19.29
2013 Elan 350
19.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Hylas 42 and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Hylas 42 is a 1990s design by Hylas from Taiwan, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1994 Hylas 42 was penned by German Frers. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1994 Hylas 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The 1994 Hylas 42 is 2.13m longer than the 2013 Elan 350. The 1994 Hylas 42 displaces approximately 56% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Hylas 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.80 and 74.3 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2013 Elan 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Hylas 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1994 Hylas 42 and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Hylas 42 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 379L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1994 Hylas 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Elan 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1994 Hylas 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 Hylas 42 · 2013 Elan 350