1994 J/105 vs Catalina 390 — Comparison

1994 J/105
VS
Catalina 390

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 J/105Catalina 390
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsCatalina
Year1994–20081997–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRod JohnstoneGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA10.52 m (34.5 ft)11.89 m (39.0 ft)
LWL8.97 m (29.4 ft)10.21 m (33.5 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.76 m (12.3 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)8,256 kg (18,201 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area57.6 m² (620 ft²)65.5 m² (705 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)265 L (70.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 J/105
23.80
Catalina 390
16.29
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 J/105
43.52
Catalina 390
39.56
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 J/105
0.84
Catalina 390
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 J/105
13.68
Catalina 390
18.93

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 J/105 and Catalina 390 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 J/105 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Catalina 390 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1994 J/105 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Catalina 390 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1994 J/105 measures 10.52m (34.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Catalina 390 at 11.89m (39.0ft) with a 3.76m beam. The Catalina 390 is 1.37m longer than the 1994 J/105. The Catalina 390 displaces approximately 114% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 J/105 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 23.80 and 57.6 m² of sail area. The Catalina 390, with an SA/D of 16.29 and 65.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1994 J/105 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 J/105 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 13.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.84). The Catalina 390 has a comfort ratio of 18.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1994 J/105 and 39.6% for the Catalina 390, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 J/105 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Catalina 390 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 265L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Catalina 390 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 J/105 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 390 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 J/105 · Catalina 390