1994 J/105 vs 2015 ClubSwan 36 — Comparison

1994 J/105
VS
2015 ClubSwan 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 J/1052015 ClubSwan 36
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsNautor Swan
Year1994–20082015
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFinland
DesignerRod JohnstoneJuan Kouyoumdjian
Dimensions
LOA10.52 m (34.5 ft)11.00 m (36.1 ft)
LWL8.97 m (29.4 ft)9.90 m (32.5 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.30 m (10.8 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)2.30 m (7.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)4,800 kg (10,582 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area57.6 m² (620 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths64
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 J/105
23.80
2015 ClubSwan 36
23.21
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 J/105
43.52
2015 ClubSwan 36
35.42
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 J/105
0.84
2015 ClubSwan 36
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 J/105
13.68
2015 ClubSwan 36
14.37

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 J/105 and 2015 ClubSwan 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 J/105 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 2015 ClubSwan 36 is a modern offering from Nautor Swan from Finland. The 1994 J/105 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 was designed by Juan Kouyoumdjian.

In terms of size, the 1994 J/105 measures 10.52m (34.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 2015 ClubSwan 36 at 11.00m (36.1ft) with a 3.30m beam. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 is 0.48m longer than the 1994 J/105. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 displaces approximately 24% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 J/105 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 23.80 and 57.6 m² of sail area. The 2015 ClubSwan 36, with an SA/D of 23.21 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 1994 J/105 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 J/105 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 13.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.84). The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has a comfort ratio of 14.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1994 J/105 and 35.4% for the 2015 ClubSwan 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 J/105 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 60L water and 40L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2015 ClubSwan 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 J/105 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1994 J/105 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 J/105 · 2015 ClubSwan 36